Triple Helix Collaboration in Indonesia’s Covid-19 Vaccine Development: Understanding The Barriers and Enablers

Diah Anggraeni Jatraningrum, Rahmi Kartika Jati, Syafrizal Maludin, Radot Manalu, Rahmi Lestari Helmi, Wati Hermawati

Abstract


The development of the Covid-19 vaccine (nationally named Merah Putih Vaccine) is a national innovation activity initiated by the Indonesian central government and coordinated by the National Research and Innovation Agency. This study aims to understand the collaboration between the triple helix components (Industry, Academician, and Government) in the Merah Putih vaccine (MP vaccine). An exploratory study of the actors involved in developing the MP vaccine was carried out through a primary data collection process from January to August 2021. Furthermore, a descriptive analysis of triple helix collaboration discloses components, functions, and configuration in the MP vaccine development. Our finding reveals that the most highlighted issue is the reputation concerning two significant dimensions; scientists' experience or R&D human resources on real-life projects and the R&D facilities and infrastructure. However, neither of the dimensions can accelerate the proof-of-concept vaccine candidate immediately. The critical findings of this research serve as empirical evidence of the barriers and enablers of a national innovation project initiated by the government, as seen from the triple helix collaboration with the emerging issues approach

Keywords: Triple Helix Collaboration, Covid-19, Emerging Issue, Vaccine


Full Text:

PDF

References


Allanson, P., & Montagna, C. (2005). Multiproduct firms and market structure: An explorative application to the product life cycle. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 23(7–8). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2005.02.001

Bio Farma. (2019). 2019 Annual Report of Bio Farma. Retrieved from https://www.biofarma.co.id/en/annual-report. Download on 10-15-2021.

Bio Farma. (2021). 50th Delivery of Covid-19 Vaccine Arrives at Bio Farma: Covid-19 Vaccine Supply is Safe Covid-19 Vaccine Distribution Continues. Retrieved from https://www.biofarma.co.id/en/latest-news/detail/50th-delivery-of-covid19-vaccine-arrives-at-bio-farma-covid19-vaccine-supply-is-safe-covid19-vaccine-distribution-continues. Download on 10-15-2021.

Bloom, D. E., Cadarette, D., Ferranna, M., Hyer, R. N., & Tortorice, D. L. (2021). How New Models Of Vaccine Development For COVID-19 Have Helped Address An Epic Public Health Crisis. Health Affairs, 40(3). https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2020.02012

Cai, Y. (2013). Enhancing context sensitivity of the Triple Helix model: An institutional logics perspective. The Triple Helix XI International Conference, 1–30. https://www.triplehelixconference.org/th/11/bic/docs/Papers/Cai.pdf

Cai, Y., & Etzkowitz, H. (2020). Theorizing the Triple Helix model: Past, present, and future. Triple Helix Journal. https://doi.org/10.1163/21971927-bja10003

Cai, Y., & Liu, C. (2015). The roles of universities in fostering knowledge-intensive clusters in Chinese regional innovation systems. Science and Public Policy, 42(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scu018

Cai, Y., Ramis Ferrer, B., & Luis Martinez Lastra, J. (2019). Building University-Industry Co-Innovation Networks in Transnational Innovation Ecosystems: Towards a Transdisciplinary Approach of Integrating Social Sciences and Artificial Intelligence. Sustainability, 11(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11174633

Cape Bio Pharms. (2021). Our Story. Retrieved from http://www.capebiopharms.com/about/Our-Story. Download on 10-15-2021.

Chung, C. (2013). Government, policy-making and the development of innovation system: The cases of Taiwanese pharmaceutical biotechnology policies (2000–2008). Research Policy, 42(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.01.007

Collins, A. (1998). National Science Education Standards: A political document. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(7). https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199809)35:7<711::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-O

Collinson, S., & Liu, Y. (2019). Recombination for innovation: performance outcomes from international partnerships in China. R&D Management, 49(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12293

Conceicao, P., & Heitor, M. v. (1999). On the role of the university in the knowledge economy. Science and Public Policy, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.3152/147154399781782617

Contractor, F. J., & Lorange, P. (2002). The growth of alliances in the knowledge-based economy. International Business Review, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-5931(02)00021-5

Detmer, D. E. (2003). Building the national health information infrastructure for personal health, health care services, public health, and research. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-3-1

Druedahl, L. C., Minssen, T., & Nicholson Price, W. (2021). Collaboration in Times of Crisis: A Study on COVID-19 Vaccine R&D Partnerships. Vaccine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.08.101

Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1). https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24160888

Etzkowitz, H. (2008). The Triple Helix. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203929605

Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1997). Introduction to special issue on science policy dimensions of the Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Science and Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.1093/spp/24.1.2

Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4

Etzkowitz, H., & Zhou, C. (2018). Innovation incommensurability and the science park. R&D Management, 48(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12266

Fontes, M. (2005). The process of transformation of scientific and technological knowledge into economic value conducted by biotechnology spin-offs. Technovation, 25(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2003.08.004

Geddes, L. (2021). How effective are COVID-19 vaccines in the real-world? GAVI. Retrieved from https://www.gavi.org/vaccineswork/how-effective-are-covid-19-vaccines-real-world. Download on 10-15-2021.

Guimón, J., & Narula, R. (2020). Ending the COVID-19 Pandemic Requires More International Collaboration. Research-Technology Management, 63(5). https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2020.1790239

Hishida, K. (2013). Fulfilling the Promise of Technology Transfer (K. Hishida, Ed.). Springer Japan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54306-0

James, T. E., & Jorgensen, P. D. (2009). Policy Knowledge, Policy Formulation, and Change: Revisiting a Foundational Question. Policy Studies Journal, 37(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00300.x

Jørgensen, H. D. (2004). Interactive Process Models. (Doctoral thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway)

Knudson, W., Wysocki, A., Champagne, J., & Peterson, H. C. (2004). Entrepreneurship and Innovation in the Agri-Food System. In Source: American Journal of Agricultural Economics (Vol. 86, Issue 5). https://www.jstor.org/stable/3697949

Konstantinovich, K., Alekseevna, K., Viktorovna, D., & Vladimirovich, S. (2021). The modern outline of the “triple helix” system: generating ideas in the fight against the pandemic. Journal of Complementary Medicine Research, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.5455/jcmr.2021.12.01.20

Kreusel, N., Roth, N., & Brem, A. (2018). European business venturing in times of digitisation - an analysis of for-profit business incubators in a triple helix context. International Journal of Technology Management, 76(1/2). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2018.088707

Krippendorff, K. (1989). Product Semantics: A Triangulation and Four Design Theories. http://repository.upenn.edu/asc_papers/254

Kumari, M., & Mallick, S. (2017). Triple Helix Model of Innovation and the Politics of Genetically Modified Crops: Cases of Bt Cotton and Bt Brinjal in India. Perspectives on Global Development and Technology, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.1163/15691497-12341443

Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data. Academy of Management Review, 24(4). https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.2553248

Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The triple helix: an evolutionary model of innovations. Research Policy, 29(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00063-3

Leydesdorff, L. (2018). Synergy in Knowledge-Based Innovation Systems at National and Regional Levels: The Triple-Helix Model and the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc4020016

Leydesdorff, L., & Fritsch, M. (2006). Measuring the knowledge base of regional innovation systems in Germany in terms of a Triple Helix dynamics. Research Policy, 35(10). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.027

Leydesdorff, L., & Meyer, M. (2003). The Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Scientometrics, 58(2). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026276308287

Liu, C., & Cai, Y. (2018). Triple Helix Model and Institutional Logics in Shenzhen Special Economic Zone. Science and Public Policy, 45(2). https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scx059

Liu, J., Chaminade, C., & Asheim, B. (2013). The Geography and Structure of Global Innovation Networks: A Knowledge Base Perspective. European Planning Studies, 21(9). https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.755842

Lurie, N., Saville, M., Hatchett, R., & Halton, J. (2020). Developing Covid-19 Vaccines at Pandemic Speed. New England Journal of Medicine, 382(21). https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2005630

Mian, S. A. (1996). The university business incubator: A strategy for developing new research/technology-based firms. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1047-8310(96)90004-8

Monsreal-Barrera, M. M., Cruz-Mejia, O., Ozkul, S., & Saucedo-Martínez, J. A. (2020). An optimization model for investment in technology and government regulation. Wireless Networks, 26(7). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-019-01958-z

Moretti, F., van Vliet, L., Bensing, J., Deledda, G., Mazzi, M., Rimondini, M., Zimmermann, C., & Fletcher, I. (2011). A standardized approach to qualitative content analysis of focus group discussions from different countries. Patient Education and Counseling, 82(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.005

Nurhakim, F. (2021). Indonesia Tidak Berpengalaman Buat Vaksin COVID-19. Retrieved from https://www.gatra.com/detail/news/509049/kesehatan/indonesia-tidak-berpengalaman-buat-vaksin-covid-19. Download on 10-15-2021.

O’Sullivan, E., Andreoni, A., Lopez-Gomez, C., & Gregory, M. (2013). What is new in the new industrial policy? A manufacturing systems perspective. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 29(2). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grt027

Ranga, M., & Etzkowitz, H. (2013). Triple Helix Systems: An Analytical Framework for Innovation Policy and Practice in the Knowledge Society. Industry and Higher Education, 27(4). https://doi.org/10.5367/ihe.2013.0165

Rappuoli, R., & Hanon, E. (2018). Sustainable vaccine development: a vaccine manufacturer’s perspective. Current Opinion in Immunology, 53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coi.2018.04.019

Razak, A. A., & White, G. R. T. (2015). The Triple Helix model for innovation: a holistic exploration of barriers and enablers. International Journal of Business Performance and Supply Chain Modelling, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBPSCM.2015.071600

Saad, M., & Zawdie, G. (2011). Introduction to special issue: The emerging role of universities in socio-economic development through knowledge networking. Science and Public Policy, 38(1). https://doi.org/10.3152/030234211X12960315267453

Schramm, L. (2017). An Innovation Technology: A Dictionary. In Innovation Technology. De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110429176-002

Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (1996). The Emergence of a Competitiveness Research and Development Policy Coalition and the Commercialization of Academic Science and Technology. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 21(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399602100303

Solesvik, M. Z. (2017). The triple helix model for regional development and innovation: Context of nordic countries. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 5(4), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.23762/FSO_VOL5NO4_17_1

Szeinbach, S. L., Barnes, J. H., & Garner, D. D. (1997). Use of pharmaceutical manufacturers’ value-added services to build customer loyalty. Journal of Business Research, 40(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(96)00239-1

The Jenner Institute. (2021, October 10). People. Retrieved from https://www.jenner.ac.uk/Team. Download on 10-15-2021.

Tran, T. A., & Kocaoglu, D. F. (2009, August). Literature review on technology transfer from government laboratories to industry. PICMET ’09 - 2009 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1109/PICMET.2009.5261800

Veselá, D., & Klimová, K. (2014). Knowledge-based Economy vs. Creative Economy. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.072

Viale, R. (2013). Knowledge Driven Capitalization of Knowledge Capitalization of knowledge. In Methodological Cognitivism. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40216-6_14

WHO. (2021a). COVID-19 vaccines. Retrieved from Https://Www.Who.Int/Emergencies/Diseases/Novel-Coronavirus-2019/Covid-19-Vaccines. Download on 10-15-2021.

WHO. (2021b). The different types of COVID-19 vaccines. WHO's Vaccines Explained Series. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/news-room/feature-stories/detail/the-race-for-a-covid-19-vaccine-explained. Download on 10-15-2021.

WHO. (2021c). COVID-19 vaccine tracker and landscape. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/draft-landscape-of-covid-19-candidate-vaccines. Downloaded on 10-15-2021.

Yang, P. Y., & Chang, Y. -C. (2010). Academic research commercialization and knowledge production and diffusion: the moderating effects of entrepreneurial commitment. Scientometrics, 83(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0075-1

Yoda, N., & Kuwashima, K. (2020). Triple Helix of University–Industry–Government Relations in Japan: Transitions of Collaborations and Interactions. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-019-00595-3

Yoon, J., & Park, H. W. (2017). Triple helix dynamics of South Korea’s innovation system: a network analysis of inter-regional technological collaborations. Quality & Quantity, 51(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-016-0346-x




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14203/STIPM.2021.309

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 STI Policy and Management Journal

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright of Journal of STI (Science Technology Innovation) Policy and Management Journal (e-ISSN 2502-5996 p-ISSN 1907-9753). Powered by OJS.