India’s Science, Technology and Innovation Policy: Choices for Course Correction with Lessons Learned from China

G.D. Sandhya

doi:10.14203/STIPM.2018.131

India’s Science, Technology and Innovation Policy: Choices for Course Correction with Lessons Learned from China

G.D. Sandhya

Abstract

A large number of developed and emerging economies have introduced S&T reforms and some of them such as Japan, South Korea and later China have used them for gaining competitive advantage in science, technology and innovation through well crafted S&T policies and appropriate strategies. So far, India has pronounced four major S&T policies beginning with the Science Policy Resolution (SPR) in 1958, Technology Policy in 1983; S&T Policy in 2003 and Science Technology and Innovation Policy in 2013. In a period of six decades India has created a huge S&T infrastructure and made impressive achievements in space, defence and atomic energy, yet the feat is not as impressive in the industrial sector. In innovation competitiveness, R&D and human resource, the indices related to global manufacturing, competition, innovation and knowledge, India has not performed as well in comparison to other BRICS countries. In this paper an attempt has been made to look at, how comprehensive India’s STI policies with regard to policy components; a roadmap; strategies for execution and boldness in terms of identifying and recognising the failures and recommend major structural changes. What is intended is to understand the relationship between the domain of S&T policy and intended outcomes; the mismatch between the policy expectations and outcomes. An attempt is being made to identify possibility for correction by taking lessons from other economies, such as China.

Keywords: S&T policies, Innovation policies, Innovation ecosystem

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abrol, D. (2013). New Science, Technology and Innovation Policy, A critical Assessment. Economic and Political Weekly, March 2, Vol. XLVIII, 9, 10-13.

Arrow, K. J. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In “Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, NBER, 609-626.

Bound, K., Saunders, T., Wilsdon, J., & Adams, J. (2013). China’s absorptive state; Research, innovation and the prospects for China-UK collaboration. UK Science and Innovation Network. NESTA. October.

Bush, V. (1945). Science the Endless frontier. July. United States Government Printing Office, Washington.

DST. (2015). Directory of R&D institutions. Government of India, Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, National Science and Technology Management Information System, March

Gassler, H., Polt, W., Schindler, J., Weber, M., Mahroum, S., Kubczko, K., Keenan, M. (2004). Priorities in Science and Technology Policy-An international comparison. Project commissioned by the Australian Council for Research and Technology Management.

Gu, S. & Lundval, B.A. (2006). China’s innovation system and the move towards harmonious growth and endogenous innovation. Innovation: Management, Policy Practice, 8(1-2), 1-26. Crossref

Henriques, L., & Laredo, P. (2013). Policy-making in Science policy: The OECD model unveiled. Research Policy, 42, 801-816. Crossref

Huang, C. & Soete, L. (2008). The Global Challenges of the Knowledge Economy: China and the European Union. Science and Public Policy, 35(10), December, 771-781. Crossref

Jefferson, G. H. (2005). R&D and Innovation in China: Has China begun its S&T takeoff? Harvard China Review, 5(2), 44-50.

Krishna,V. (2013). Science, Technology and Innovation Policy 2013: High on goals, Low on Commitment, Economic and Political Weekly, April 20, Vol. XLVIII, No 16, 15-19.

Kroll, H. & Leifner, I. (2008). Spin-off enterprises as a means of technology commercialization in a transforming economy-Evidence from three universities in China. Technovation, 28, 293-313.

Lu, Q. & Lazonick, W. (2001). The organization of innovation in a transitional economy: business and government in Chinese electronic publishing. Research Policy, 30: 55-77. Crossref

Mrinalini, N., Sandhya, G.D., & Tyagi G. (2014). India’s Innovation Capabilities and Capacities: A Comparative Global Positioning. CSIR-NISTADS, pp 41.

Nath, P., Mrinalini, N. & Sandhya, G. D. (2001). National Textile Policy and Textile Research. Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. XXXVI, No. 5 and 6, Feb. 3-10, pp 489-496.

Nath, P. (2008). Catching-up From Way BehindL Lessons for India. International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, 1(3): 360 - 376. Crossref

Nath, P., Mrinalini, N., Sandhya, G.D. (2014). Understanding Innovation: Indian National Innovation Survey. Study sponsored by NSTMIS, DST.

Pielker, R. (2010). In Retrospect: Science-The Endless Frontier. Nature, 466, 19 August: 922-923.

Preeg, E. H. (2008). Technological advances in key industries in China, Testimony before the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission”, July 16, MAPI.

Sandhya, G.D. & Visalakshi, S. (2000). R&D Capability and Alliance formation in the Pharmaceutical industry in India. Science and Public Policy, 27(2), April : 109-121. Crossref

Sandhya, G.D. & Jain, A. (2003). Science and Technology Policies for industrial development in India. In a book on ‘Building Technological Capability, Issues and Prospects, Nepal, Bangladesh and India’, edited by Mozammel Huq, The University Press Ltd.: 133-147.

Sandhya, G.D., Nath, P., Mrinalini, N., Bannerji, P., Bhattacharya, S., Mandal, K., Dey, D., Rawat, P. & Kumar, A. (2012). A Comparative Study on S&T, Innovation and Development Strategies of China and South Korea vis-à-vis India. Study commissioned by the Office of the Principal Scientific Advisor to the Government of India, CSIR, NISTADS, 2012, June.

Sandhya, G.D., Mrinalini, N. & Nath, P. (2014). Sector and Cluster Effects of FDI in R&D in India; Emerging Trends. Economic and Political Weekly, 29 (30), July 26: 182-190.

Tilak, J. B. G. (2012). Higher Education Policy in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 47 (13), March: 36-40.

Tilak, J. B. G. (2013). Higher Education in the BRIC Member Countries: Comparative Pattern and Policies. Economic and Political Weekly, April 6, Vol. XLVIII, No 14, pp 41-47

WEF. (2015). The Global Competitiveness Report 2015-16. World Economic Forum, Geneva, Switzerland.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14203/STIPM.2018.131