The Role of Local Community Associations as Intermediaries: A Multiple Case Study in A Rural Area

Pratiwi Pratiwi

Abstract


Intermediary actors in rural areas are expected to stimulate not only economic growth but also social inclusion. The studies of innovation intermediaries in rural areas are under-researched. This study investigates the role, capabilities, and the outcome of the engagement of local community associations as intermediaries in different sectors such as agriculture, food processing, and tourism product. This study describes the way innovation promotes rural development. This research employs a multiple case study method and analyzes data triangulation. The interviews have indicated that intermediaries in different sectors need to play different roles due to their sector drivers, stakeholders, and challenges. This study also describes the outcome of the engagement of the intermediaries in increasing well-being, trust among stakeholders, and local people capability to innovate. Further, the study draws policy recommendations for the governments to enhance the skills and impact of the intermediaries, including collaborations, proposal competition, annual awards, organizational learning, training, and benchmarking.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Aaboen, L., Dubois, A., & Lind, F. (2012). Capturing processes in longitudinal multiple case studies. Industrial Marketing Management, 41(2), 235-246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2012.01.009

Bakici, T., Almirall, E., & Wareham, J. (2013). The role of public open innovation intermediaries in local government and the public sector. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 25(3), 311-327. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2013.764983

Bock, B. B. (2016). Rural marginalisation and the role of social innovation; a turn towards nexogenous development and rural reconnection. Sociologia Ruralis, 56(4), 552-573. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12119

Butler, J. R. A., Suadnya, W., Puspadi, K., Sutaryono, Y., Wise, R. M., Skewes, T. D., & Kisman, M. (2014). Framing the application of adaptation pathways for rural livelihoods and global change in eastern Indonesian islands. Global Environmental Change, 28, 368-382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.12.004

Central Bureau of Statistic. (2018). Regional Statistics of Kulonprogo Regency. Retrieved from: https://kulonprogokab.bps.go.id/publication/2018/10/24/d0a6f5ff1dcedd99e05e88dc/statistik-daerah-kabupaten-kulon-progo-2018.html

Damuri, Y. R., Aswichayono, H., Christian, David., (2018). Innovation Policy in Indonesia. In Ambashi, Masahito (Ed.). Innovation Policy in ASEAN (pp. 96-125). Jakarta: Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA).

Esparcia, J. (2014). Innovation and networks in rural areas. An analysis from European innovative projects. Journal of Rural Studies, 34, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.12.004

Forstner, K. (2004). Community ventures and access to markets: The role of intermediaries in marketing rural tourism products. Development Policy Review, 22(5), 497-514. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7679.2004.00262.x

Herstad, S. J., & Ebersberger, B. (2014). Urban agglomerations, knowledge-intensive services and innovation: Establishing the core connections. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 26(3-4), 211-233. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2014.888098

Howells, J. (2006). Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation. Research Policy, 35, 715-728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.03.005

Intarakumnerd, P., & Chaoroenporn, P. (2013). The roles of intermediaries and the development of their capabilities in sectoral innovation systems: A case study of Thailand. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 21(sup2), 99-114. https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2013.819249

Kivimaa, P. (2014). Government-affiliated intermediary organisations as actors in system-level transitions. Research policy, 43(8), 1370-1380. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.02.007

Klerkx, L., & Leeuwis, C. (2007). Matching demand and supply in the agricultural knowledge infrastructure: Experiences with innovation intermediaries. Food policy, 33(3), 260-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2007.10.001

Klerkx, L., Hall, A., & Leeuwis, C. (2009). Strengthening agricultural innovation capacity: are innovation brokers the answer? (Working Paper No. 2009-019). Retrieved from UNU-MERIT website: https://cris.maastrichtuniversity.nl/portal/files/1101498/guid-050652d4-d0db-4cb5-a852-dede8c8fba03-ASSET1.0

Klerkx, L., Schut, M., Leeuwis, C., & Kilelu, C. (2012). Advances in knowledge brokering in the agricultural sector: towards innovation system facilitation. ids Bulletin, 43(5), 53-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2012.00363.x

Lang, R., & Fink, M. (2018). Rural social entrepreneurship: The role of social capital within and across institutional levels. Journal of Rural Studies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.03.012

Lee, S., Park, G., Yoon, B., & Park, J. (2010). Open innovation in SMEs—An intermediated network model. Research policy, 39(2), 290-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.12.009

Muscio, A., Nardone, G., Dottore, A. (2010), Understanding demand for innovation in the food industry. Measuring Business Excellence, 14(4) pp. 35 – 48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13683041011093749

Pant, L. P. (2016). Paradox of mainstreaming agroecology for regional and rural food security in developing countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 111, 305-316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.03.001

Partners, H. (2007). Study of the role of intermediaries in support of innovation. Canberra, Australia: Department of Industry, Tourism, and Resources. Retrieved from: https://www.howardpartners.com.au/assets/innovation-intermediaries-publication-report-apr-2007---final.pdf

Pittaway, L., Robertson, M., Munir, K., Denyer, D., & Neely, A. (2004). Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence. International journal of management reviews, 5(3‐4), 137-168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-8545.2004.00101.x

Putnam, Robert (with Robert Leonardi and Raffaella Y. Nanetti). (1993). Making Democracy Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Pittaway, L., Robertson, M., Munir, K., Denyer, D., & Neely, A. (2004). Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence. International journal of management reviews, 5(3‐4), 137-168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-8545.2004.00101.x

Reis Neto, J. F. D., Muñoz-Gallego, P. A., Souza, C. C. D., Pedrinho, D. R., Favero, S., & von Mühlen, A. S. R. (2016). Strategic orientations and cooperation of external agents in the innovation process of rural enterprises. Ciência Rural, 46(10), 1878-1884. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20160094

Requier-Desjardins, D., Boucher, F., & Cerdan, C. (2003). Globalization, competitive advantages and the evolution of production systems: rural food processing and localized agri-food systems in Latin-American countries. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 15(1), 49-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985620210144983

Retnandari, N. D. (2017). Bela Beli Kulon Progo as A Policy for Strengthening The Capacity of Local Economy. Policy & Governance Review, 1(2), 109-124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30589/pgr.v1i2.48

Richter, R. (2017). Rural social enterprises as embedded intermediaries: The innovative power of connecting rural communities with supra-regional networks. Journal of Rural Studies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.12.005

Sari, K., Alamsyah, P., Asmara, A. Y., Kusnandar, K., & Mulatsih, S. (2017). Critical Role of Intermediaries on Technology Transfer: Case Study of BIOTROP and Center for Mariculture Development of Lampung. Journal of Technology Management, 16(1), 33-45. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12695/jmt.2017.16.1.3

Steiner, A., & Teasdale, S. (2017). Unlocking the potential of rural social enterprise. Journal of Rural Studies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.12.021

Sutthijakra, S., & Intarakumnerd, I (2015). Role and capabilities of intermediaries in university–industry linkages: A case of hard disk drive industry in Thailand. Science, Technology and Society, 20(2), 182-203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0971721815579796

Theodorakopoulos, N., Bennett, D., & Sánchez Preciado, D. J. (2014). Intermediation for technology diffusion and user innovation in a developing rural economy: A social learning perspective. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 26(7-8), 645-662. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2014.971077

Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2005). One size fits all?: Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research policy, 34(8), https://doi.org/1203-1219. 10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.018

Watkins, A., Papaioannou, T., Mugwagwa, J., & Kale, D. (2015). National innovation systems and the intermediary role of industry associations in building institutional capacities for innovation in developing countries: A critical review of the literature. Research Policy, 44(8), 1407-1418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.05.004

Woolthuis, R. K. et al. (2005). "A System Failure Framework for Innovation Policy Design." Technovation 25: 609-619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2003.11.002

Xu, Q. (2019, July). Optimal Design of Smarter Tourism User Experience Driving by Service Design. In International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (pp. 542-551). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19135-1_53

Yang, H., Klerkx, L., & Leeuwis, C. (2014). Functions and limitations of farmer cooperatives as innovation intermediaries: Findings from China. Agricultural Systems, 127, 115-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2014.02.005




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14203/STIPM.2020.175

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 STI Policy and Management Journal

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright of Journal of STI (Science Technology Innovation) Policy and Management Journal (e-ISSN 2502-5996 p-ISSN 1907-9753). Powered by OJS.