Dynamics of Bioplastics Development in Indonesia
Abstract
Increase in consumption of conventional plastics lead to environmental problems. Therefore, some efforts are needed to overcome it, one of them by using bioplastics. However, in Indonesia, companies engaged in bioplastics sector are still rarely found. Without the readiness of the bioplastics industry in Indonesia, development of bioplastics which ends to solve environmental problems cannot be realized. Through Socio-Technical Systems (STS) approach with Multi Level Perspective framework, this Papper analyze the dynamics of the transition of bioplastics in Indonesia. The results show the presence of pressure from landscape to underdeveloped niche, regime actors would give respond by modifying path development from its innovation activities. In other words, bioplastics in Indonesia has not yet experiencing a transition to replace conventional plastics. Precisely, technology in regime level experiencing change by developing additive plastic. However, there are several things that hinder further development of the niche, which include the high price of bioplastics and implementation of regulations related with incentives and disincentives and there is no coordination and shared vision between actor in niche level.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aminullah, E., Fizzanty, T., Indraprahasta, G. S., & Asmara, I. J. (2015). Technological convergence in Indonesian firms: Cases of biobased chemical product innovation. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 23,Issues sup1, 9-25. Crossref
Byun, Y., & Kim, Y. T. (2014). Utilization of bioplastics for food packaging industry. In J. H. Han (Ed.), Innovations in food packaging (2nd ed., pp. 369–390). Elsevier. Crossref
Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31(2002), 1257–1274. Crossref
Geels, F. W. (2005). Technological transitions and system innovations: A co-evolutionary and socio-technical analysis, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2007). Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy, 36(2007), 399–417. Crossref
Geels, F.W. (2012). A Socio-technical analysis of low-carbon transitions : introducing the multi-level perspective into transport studies. Journal of Transport Geography, 24(2012), 471–478. Crossref
Hardaning, P., & Adibroto, T. (2013). Present status of environmentally degradable plastic in Indonesia. Presentation at 3rd International Pastic Conference, 1–2 October 2013, Warsaw, Poland.
Hartatik, Y. D., Nuriyah, L., & Iswarin. (2014). Pengaruh komposisi kitosan terhadap sifat mekanik dan biodegradable bioplastik. Student Physics Journal, 2(1).
Jambeck, J. R., Geyer, R., Wilcox, C., Siegler,T. R., Perryman, M., Andrady, A., Narayan, R., & Law, K. L. (2015). Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. Research Report 13 Februari 2015, Vol 347 (6223), Sciencemag.org. Crossref
Markard, J., Raven, R., & Truffer, B. (2012). Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy, 41(2012), 955– 967. Crossref
Nykvist, B., & Whitmarsh, L. (2008). A multi level analysis of sustainable mobility transitions: Niche development in the UK and Sweden. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 75(2008), 1373–1387. Crossref
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14203/STIPM.2016.48
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2016 STI Policy and Management Journal
Copyright of Journal of STI (Science Technology Innovation) Policy and Management Journal (e-ISSN 2502-5996 p-ISSN 2540-9786). Powered by OJS.