Bibliometrics Analysis of Regional Autonomy Problem in Indonesia

iyomi hasti; Titin Purwaningsih

doi:10.14203/STIPM.2022.320

Bibliometrics Analysis of Regional Autonomy Problem in Indonesia

iyomi hasti, Titin Purwaningsih

Abstract

This study looks for the relationship between studies on the problem of regional autonomy in Indonesia. The author uses VOSviewer to process data from the Scopus index journal for this report. VOSviewer was used in this study to process data and map the most common and most popular focus themes. The results showed that The last few years have shown the highest number of publications with 33 documents in 2019 and in 2020 the number of documents issued was 23 documents. Over the last few years, the comparison of the trends is still dominated by Indonesia, which has 131 articles published in the Scopus database. Australia is in second place with a total of 27 published articles, followed by Singapore with 15 documents. VOSviewer analysis map classifies the largest nodes so that the most significant influence is environmental management. The drawback of this research is that the data source is only obtained from previous research so that further research can enrich data sources so that research results can be more accurate

Full Text:

PDF

References

Andriansyah, A., Sulastri, E., & Satispi, E. (2019). Economic administration and institutional management in a decentralized regime mode: New insights from environmental resources. International Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 7(4), 424–432. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.35808/ijeba/355

Bjork, C. (2006). Decentralisation in education, institutional culture and teacher autonomy in Indonesia. Decentralisation and Privatisation in Education: The Role of the State, 133–150. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-3358-2_7

Burnham, J. F. (2006). Scopus database : a review, 8, 1–8. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-5581-3-1

Casson, A., & Obidzinski, K. (2002). From new order to regional autonomy: Shifting dynamics of ‘illegal’ logging in Kalimantan, Indonesia. World Development, 30(12), 2133–2151. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(02)00125-0

Cui, W., Wu, Y., Liu, S., Wei, F., Zhou, M., & Qu, H. (2010). Context-preserving, dynamic word cloud visualization. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 30(6), 42–53. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2010.102

Dan, D., & Daerah, K. (2014). Otonomi Daerah Dalam Persepektif Pembagian Urusan Pemerintah-Pemerintah, 8(1), 69–79.

Dr. SURTIKANTI, SE., M.Si., A. (2004). Permasalahan Otonomi Daerah Ditinjau Dari Aspek Perimbangan Keuangan Pemerintah Pusat Dan Daerah. Permasalahan Otonomi Daerah Ditinjau Dari Aspek Perimbangan Keuangan Pemerintah Pusat Dan Daerah, 11(1), 15–30.

Duncan, C. R. (2007). Mixed outcomes: The impact of regional autonomy and decentralization on indigenous ethnic minorities in Indonesia. Development and Change, 38(4), 711–733. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2007.00430.x

Faisal, & Nasution, A. H. (2016). Otonomi Daerah: Masalah dan Penyelesaiannya di Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi, 4(2), 206–215. Retrieved from https://ja.ejournal.unri.ac.id/index.php/JA/article/view/3370/3287

Hastuti, P. (2018). Desentralisasi fiskal dan stabilitas politik dalam kerangka pelaksanaan otonomi daerah di indonesia. Simposium Nasional Keuangan Negara, 785–787.

Indonesia, P. (2014). Undang-undang Nomor 23 Tahun, 1–5.

Merigó, J. M., & Yang, J. B. (2017). A bibliometric analysis of operations research and management science. Omega (United Kingdom), 73, 37–48. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2016.12.004

Muqoyyidin, A. (2013). Pemekaran Wilayah Dan Otonomi Daerah Pasca Reformasi Di Indonesia: Konsep, Fakta Empiris Dan Rekomendasi Ke Depan. Jurnal Konstitusi, 10(2), 287–310.

Phahlevy, R. R. (2016). The Concept of Village Autonomy in Indonesia (Indonesian Constitution Perspective). Rechtsidee, 3(1), 27–40. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v3i1.151

Ristanti, Y. D., & Handoyo, E. (2017). Undang-Undang Otonomi Daerah Dan Pembangunan Ekonomi Daerah. Jurnal Riset Akutansi Keuangan, 2(2), 115–122.

Romdioni, A. N., Ulita, A. S., Hiktaop, K., Herdjiono, M. V. I., Hayon, P. P., & Kadir, A. R. (2020). Fiscal decentralization and regional income: Evidence from Papua province, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 473(1). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/473/1/012079

Safitri, S. (2016). Sejarah Perkembangan Otonomi Daerah Di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidilkan Sejarah, 5(9), 79–83. Retrieved from http://jurnal.untag-sby.ac.id/index.php/dih/article/view/278

Sahabuddin, C., Muliaty, M., Farida, U., Hasbi, & Yusriadi, Y. (2019). Administration of post-reformation decentralization government. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(3), 7631–7634. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.C6182.098319

Seymour, R., & Turner, S. (2002). Otonomi daerah: Indonesia’s decentralisation experiment. New Zealand Journal of Asian Studies, 4, 33–51.

Sugiyono. (2009). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D). Bandung: IKAPI.

Sukri, Ariana, Armunanto, A., Nadir, S., & Ekawaty, D. (2019). Environmental dilemma under implementation of Indonesian regional autonomy. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 343(1). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/343/1/012088

Triandini, E., Jayanatha, S., Indrawan, A., Putra, G. W., & Iswara, B. (2019). Metode Systematic Literature Review untuk Identifikasi Platform dan Metode Pengembangan Sistem Informasi di Indonesia, 1(2).

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14203/STIPM.2022.320