Indonesia’s Innovation Policies: Evolution and Institutional Structure

Togar M. Simatupang; Fitriani Tupa R Silalahi; Liane Okdinawati; Widya Nandini; Putu Franciska Fajarini

doi:10.14203/STIPM.2022.343

Indonesia’s Innovation Policies: Evolution and Institutional Structure

Togar M. Simatupang, Fitriani Tupa R Silalahi, Liane Okdinawati, Widya Nandini, Putu Franciska Fajarini

Abstract

Along with world developments that encourage every country to innovate, Indonesia also has aspirations to increase domestic innovation. The success of several other countries in increasing economic growth through innovation is the driving force. Indonesia also has the same desire to pay attention to innovation and science, and technology. Along the way, there have been developments in innovation policies in Indonesia in terms of institutional structure and implementation of innovative programs. This paper tries to identify how the innovation policy has developed through quantitative analysis of innovation, science and technology regulations starting in 2004. This paper has divided the regulations into four eras according to the era of the elected President from 2004 to 2024. A multi-dimensional quantitative methodology is carried out to examine Indonesia's innovation policies. The policy search is carried out by searching for regulations in two Indonesian regulatory databases. From the analysis results, it is found that Indonesia has driven S&T and innovation policies, including policies that support innovation funding and has made several changes to the formation of innovation organizations to produce better coordination between researchers who create innovative products and industries as users.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Fagerberg, J., & Srholec, M. J. R. p. (2008). National innovation systems, capabilities and economic development. 37(9), 1417-1435.

Fitriati, R., & Rahmayanti, K. P. (2012). “Government Support in Triple Helix Collaboration to Provide Health Service Delivery: Case Study Government Hospital in Bengkulu Hospital”. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 52, 160-167. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.452

Fromhold-Eisebith, M. J. E. P. S. (2007). Bridging scales in innovation policies: How to link regional, national and international innovation systems. 15(2), 217-233.

Indonesia, P. R. (2006). Perpres No 7 Tahun 2006 Tentang Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Nasional Tahun 2004-2009.

Indonesia, P. R. (2010). Perpres No. 5 Tahun 2010 Tentang Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Nasional Tahun 2010 – 2014.

Indonesia, P. R. (2015). Perpres No. 2 Tahun 2015 Tentang Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Nasional Tahun 2015 – 2019.

Indonesia, P. R. (2020). Perpres No. 18 Tahun 2020 Tentang Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Nasional Tahun 2020–2024.

KANG, S. (2018). Korea’s National Systems of Innovation (70 Years) : Framework and National Experience. Experts Meeting-National Systems of Innovation 21-23 February, 2018 UN Environment Office, Paris. Ministry of Science and ICT(MSIT). Paris.

Lee, C., & Narjoko, D. J. A. E. P. R. (2015). Escaping the Middle‐Income Trap in S outheast A sia: Micro Evidence on Innovation, Productivity, and Globalization. 10(1), 124-147.

Lin, J. Y. J. J. o. C. e., & studies, B. (2017). Industrial policies for avoiding the middle-income trap: a new structural economics perspective. 15(1), 5-18.

Liu, F.-c., Simon, D. F., Sun, Y.-t., & Cao, C. J. R. P. (2011). China's innovation policies: Evolution, institutional structure, and trajectory. 40(7), 917-931.

Lundvall, B.-Å. (1992). Introduction, in: B.-A. Lundvall (Ed.) National Systems of Innovation, pp. 1–19.

Martini, L., Tjakraatmadja, J. H., Anggoro, Y., Pritasari, A., & Hutapea, L. (2012). Triple Helix Collaboration to Develop Economic Corridors as Knowledge Hub in Indonesia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 52, 130-139. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.449

Maskell, P., & Malmberg, A. J. C. j. o. e. (1999). Localised learning and industrial competitiveness. 23(2), 167-185.

Perdana, T., & Kusnandar. (2012). The Triple Helix Model for Fruits and Vegetables Supply Chain Management Development Involving Small Farmers in Order to Fulfill the Global Market Demand: A Case Study in “Value Chain Center (VCC) Universitas Padjadjaran”. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 52, 80-89. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.444

Poveda, A. C., & Pardo, C. I. (2020). Science, technology, innovation, theory and evidence: the new institutionality in Colombia. Retrieved from

Putera, P. B., Miftahul Jannah, L. M. J. I. J. o. A. S., & Organization. (2012). Science & Technology and Innovation Policies in Science & Technological Research, Development, and Implementation. 19(3).

Rasiah, R. J. I. P. i. A. (2018). Innovation policy, inputs, and outputs in ASEAN. 285-286.

Sunitiyoso, Y., Wicaksono, A., Utomo, D. S., Putro, U. S., & Mangkusubroto, K. (2012). Developing Strategic Initiatives through Triple Helix Interactions: Systems Modelling for Policy Development. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 52, 140-149. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.450

Taufik, T. A. (2007). Indonesia’s Sub-national Innovation System Policy and Programmes. Paper presented at the National Workshop on Subnational Innovation Systems and Technology Capacity Building Policies to Enhance Competitiveness of SMEs, Jakarta.

Wahyudi, M. Z., & Arlinta, D. (2020). Peran DRN Diambil Alih BRIN, Koordinasi Riset Diperkuat Retrieved from https://www.kompas.id/baca/ilmu-pengetahuan-teknologi/2020/12/03/badan-riset-dan-inovasi-nasional-memiliki-kewenangan-lebih-besar-dari-dewan-riset-nasional

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14203/STIPM.2022.343