Psychological Elements of The Actors As an Intangible Factor in The Co-Creation Process

Mia Rahma Romadona, Rendi Febrianda, Sigit Setiawan

Abstract


The studies that investigate the intangible factors that influence the success of co-creation, including the psychological aspects of the engaged actors' individual psychology, have not been well addressed. The intangible components, particularly the psychological aspects have gained little attention as many studies concentrate on tangible factors. The purpose of this study is to look into the psychological aspects of the actors as an intangible factor in the co-creation process between the Indonesian company PT X and the Indonesian Public Research Institute Y (PRI Y) through using Gerlink LIPI High Flow Nasal Cannula 01 (GLP HFNC 01) as a technological innovation. This study used a case study strategy and qualitative method to obtain in-depth data and to determine a more precise saturation point. The results show that personal proximity as a psychological aspect of interpersonal contact is the primary determinant of co-creation formation. Pleasant communication and personal engagement are crucial factors in establishing co-creation among industry, public R&D institutes, and consumers. The actors involved in the co-creation demonstrate that the individual's characters have a significant impact to foster the co-creation process such as open-mindedness, information-seeking, team leadership, interpersonal communication, and teamwork.

 

Keywords: character, psychology, co-creation, commitment, communication, innovation, researcher, industry

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdullah, N. L., Hamzah, N., Arshad, R., Isa, R. M., & Ghani, R. A. (2011). Psychological contract and knowledge sharing among academicians: mediating role of relational social capital. Int. Bus. Res. 4, 231–241 doi: 10.5539/ibr.v4n4p231

Ahmad, I., & Zafar, M. A. (2018). Impact of psychological contract fulfillment on organizational citizenship behavior mediating role of perceived organizational support. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 30, 1001–1015. doi: 10.1108/IJCHM-12-2016-0659

Al-Kumaim, N. H., Alhazmi, A. K., Ramayah, T., Shabbir, M. S., & Gazem, N. A. (2021). Sustaining continuous engagement in value co-creation among individuals in universities using online platforms: role of knowledge self-efficacy, commitment and perceived benefits. Front. Psychol. 12:637808. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.637808

Arroyave, J. J. (2020). Cooperation With Universities in the Development of Eco-Innovations and Firms’ Performance. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.612465

Bi, Q. (2019). Cultivating loyal customers through online customer communities: a psychological contract perspective. J. Bus. Res. 103, 34–44. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.06.005

Carranza, R., & Díaz, E. (2021). e-Banking Adoption: An Opportunity for Customer Value Co-creation. Frontiers in Psychology. 11:621248. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.621248

Chang, J., Wang, J. J., & Bai, X. (2020). Good match matters: knowledge co-creation in international joint ventures. Industrial Marketing Management, 84, 138-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.06.005

Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., & West, J. (2014). New Frontiers in Open Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199682461.001.0001

Chen, T., Dodds, S., Finsterwalder, J., Witell, L., Cheung, L., Falter, M., Garry, T., Snyder, H. and McColl-Kennedy, J.R. (2021). Dynamics of wellbeing co-creation: a psychological ownership perspective. Journal of Service Management, 32(3), 383-406. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-09-2019-0297

Cirera, X., & Maloney, W.F. (2017). The Innovation Paradox - Open Knowledge Repository. World Bank. Available in:

https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/28341/211160ov.pdf?sequence=5

Creswell, J.W. 2014. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design Choosing among five Approaches. Thousands Oaks: Sage Publications.

de Oliveira, D. T., & Cortimiglia, M. N. (2017). Value co-creation in web-based multisided platforms: A conceptual framework and implications for business model design. Business Horizons, 60(6), 747-758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2017.07.002

De Silva, M.,Gokhberg, L., Meissner, D., & Russo, M. (2020). Why Do We Need Science-Based Co-Creation?. Available in PPT Web acsess: https://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=De+Silva%2C+M.%2CGokhberg%2C+L.%2C+Meissner%2C+D.%2C+%26+Russo%2C+M.+(2020).+Why+Do+We+Need+Science-Based+Co-Creation%3F.&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8.

De Silva, M. & Rossi, F. (2018) The effect of firms’ relational capabilities on knowledge acquisition and co-creation with universities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 133, 72–84.

De Silva, M., & Wright, M. (2019). Entrepreneurial co-creation: societal impact through open innovation. R&D Management. 49(3), 1-25. doi:10.1111/radm.12362

Epitropaki, O. (2013). A multi-level investigation of psychological contract breach and organizational identification through the lens of perceived organizational membership: testing a moderated-mediated model. J. Organ. Behav. 34, 65–86. doi:10.1002/job.1793

Etzkowitz, H. (1993). Technology transfer: the second academic revolution. Technology Access Report, 6, 7–9.

Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1995), The Triple Helix -- University-Industry-Government Relations: A Laboratory for Knowledge Based Economic Development (January 1). EASST Review, 14(1), 14-19, 1995, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2480085

Forsman, R. (2014). How to Promote Knowledge Sharing in Organizations Using the Psychological Contract as a Management Tool. [Master’s thesis]. University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland

Garro-Abarca, V., Palos-Sanchez, P. & Aguayo-Camacho, M. (2021). Virtual Teams in Times of Pandemic: Factors That Influence Performance. Front. Psychol. 12:624637. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.624637

Grönroos, C. (2017). Relationship marketing readiness: theoretical background and measurement directions. Journal of Services Marketing. 31(3), 218-225. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-02-2017-0056

González Santa Cruz F, Moreira Mero, N., Loor Alcívar, M. I., & Hidalgo Fernández, A. (2020). Analysis of the Internal Marketing Dimensions in Social Economy Organizations: Study Applied to Co-operativism in Ecuador. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.580673

Hair, J.F., Barth, K., Neubert, D., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). Examining the role of psychological ownership and feedback in customer empowerment strategies. Journal of Creating Value, 2(2), p: 194-210. DOI: 10.1177/2394964316661811

Hsieh, S. H., & Chang, A. (2016). The Psychological Mechanism of Brand Co-creation Engagement. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 33, 13–26. doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2015.10.001

Jaakkola, E., Helkkula, A. & Aarikka-Stenroos, L. (2015). Service experience co-creation: conceptualization, implications, and future research directions. Journal of Service Management. 26(2), 182-205. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-12-2014-0323

Kompas. (2021). Mengenal Alat Bantu Pernapasan HFNC untuk Pasien Covid-19. [Get to know the HFNC Breathing Apparatus for Covid-19 Patients]. Acsess in 5 February 2022, avalaible at: https://www.kompas.com/sains/read/2021/06/30/100200723/mengenal-alat-bantu-pernapasan-hfnc-untuk-pasien-covid-19?page=all&fbclid=IwAR3SUhpcjZiknigc6a9cOS-lLHCfmzCLDiQkBAi0YANZYyXtEvO5i7uL6z8Laursen, K. and Foss, N. (2003) New HRM practices, complementarities, and the impact on innovation performance. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 27, 243–263.

Lazo-Porras, M., Bernabe-Ortiz, A., Taype-Rondan, A., Gilman, R. H., Malaga, G., Manrique, H., Neyra, L., Calderon, J., Pinto, M., Armstrong, D. G., Montori, V. M., & Miranda, J. J. (2020). Foot thermometry with mHeath-based supplementation to prevent diabetic foot ulcers: A randomized controlled trial. Wellcome open research, 5, 23. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15531.2

Lee, P. K. C., Cheng, T. C. E., Yeung, A. C. L., & Lai, K. (2011). An empirical study of transformational leadership, team performance and service quality in retail banks. Omega, 39(6), 690–701.doi:10.1016/j.omega.2011.02.001

Levinson, H., Price, C. R., Munden, K. J., Mandl, H. J., and Solley, C. M. (1962). Men, Management, Mental Health. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Harvard University Press. doi: 10.4159/harvard.9780674424746

Leydesdorff, L. (1996). Luhmann’s sociological theory: its operationalisation and future perspectives. Social Science Information. 35, 283–306.

Liu W, Chen X, Lu X and Fan X (2021). Exploring the Relationship Between Users’ Psychological Contracts and Their Knowledge Contribution in Online Health Communities. Front. Psychol. 12:612030. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.612030

Martínez-Cañas R, García-Haro, M.A., Ruíz-Palomino, P., & Kelly, L. (2021). Editorial: Social and Psychological Determinants of Value Co-creation in the Digital Era. Front. Psychol. 12:683829. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.683829

Masterson, S. S., & Stamper, C. L. (2003). Perceived organizational membership: an aggregate framework representing the employee-organization relationship. J. Organ. Behav. 24, 473–490. doi: 10.1002/job.203

Mendez-Aparicio, M.D., Jimenez-Zarco, A., Izquierdo-Yusta, A., & Blazquez-Resino, J. J. (2020). Customer experience and satisfaction in private insurance web areas. Frontiers in Psychology, 11: 581659. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.581659

Merz, M.A., Zarantonello, L., Grappi, S. (2018). How valuable are your customers in the brand value co-creation process? The development of a Customer Co-Creation Value (CCCV) scale. Journal of Business Research, 82, p. 79-89.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.08.018

Njera-Snchez J-J, Ortiz-de-Urbina-Criado, M. & Mora-Valentin, E-M. (2020). Mapping Value Co-creation Literature in the Technology and Innovation Management Field: A Bibliographic Coupling Analysis. Front. Psychol. 11:588648. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.588648

Peris-Ortiz, M., Bennett, D.R. and Yábar, D.P.B. (2017) Sustainable Smart Cities. In: Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management, Springer International Publishing Switzerland, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40895-8

Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2000). Co-opting customer competence. Harvard Bus. Rev. 78, 79–90. doi: 10.1023/A:1008796822813

Ranga, M., & Etzkowitz, H. (2013). Triple helix systems: An analytical framework for innovation policy and practice in the knowledge society. Industry & Higher Education. 27(3), August, 237–262, doi: 10.5367/ihe.2013.0165

Ranjan, K.R. & Read, S. (2019). Bringing the individual into the co-creation of value. Journal of Services Marketing. 33(7), 904-920. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-02-2019-0056

Robson, C. (1993). Real World Research. A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner Researchers. Blackwell Publishers Inc., Oxford.

Romadona, M. R., & Setiawan, S. (2019). Impact of Communication in Organization to Readiness for Change: Case of Research Organization X. SU-AFBE 2018, Proceeding of the 1st Sampoerna UniversityAFBE International Conference. doi: 10.4108/eai.6-12-2018.2286327

Romadona, M. R. (2016). Interpersonal Communication Competency of Researchers Based Personality Typilogy (Kompetensi Komunikasi Interpersonal Peneliti Berdasarkan Tipologi Kepribadian). Jurnal Pekommas, 1(2), 167–176. https://doi.org/10.30818/jpkm.2016.2010206

Roser, T., Samson, A., Humphreys, P., & Cruz-Valdivieso, E. (2009). Co-creation, new pathways to value: an overview. https://www.portugalglobal.pt/PT/RoadShow/Documents/2016/GuimaraesCo_creationNewPathways_to_value_An_overview.pdf

Saarijärvi, H., Kannan, P.K. & Kuusela, H. (2013).Value co‐creation: theoretical approaches and practical implications. European Business Review. 25(1), 6-19. https://doi.org/10.1108/09555341311287718

Siddique, J., Shamim, A., Nawaz, M., Faye, I., and Rehman, M. (2021). Co-creation or co-destruction: a perspective of online customer engagement valence. Front. Psychol. 11, 3982. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.591753

Smidts, A., van Riel, C. B. M., & Pruyn, A. T. H. (2000). The impact of employee communication and perceived external prestige on organizational identification. Acad. Manage. J. 49, 1051–1062 doi: 10.5465/3069448

Siregar, S., & Scheffer, C. (2021). The Process & Barriers in Computer-Miediated Communication (A case study of Indonesian and Australian Students’ Collaboration Project). Jurnal Studi Komunikasi dan Media, 25(2). 93-110. DOI: 10.31445/jskm.2021.3513

Swaborn, P (2010) Case Study Research. London: SAGE.

Teamwork Indonesia Design Power. Departemen Perdagangan Republik Indonesia. (2009). Rencana Pengembangan Ekonomi Kreatif di Indonesia Ministry of Trade of the Republic of Indonesia. (2009). [Creative Economy Development Plan in Indonesia]. Jakarta: Ministry of Trade. Available at: https://www.slideshare.net/andrietrisaksono/buku-2-rencana-pengembangan-ekonomi-kreatif-indonesia-2009-2015?from_action=save

Triyono, B., Pradana, A. W., & Hardiyati, R. (2019). Mendorong Peran Iptek Dalam Kerangka RPJMN Untuk Meningkatkan Daya Saing Sektor Industri [Encouraging the Role of Science and Technology in the Framework of the RPJMN to Increase the Competitiveness of the Industrial Sector]. Policy Brief P2KMI-LIPI No. 2019-05

Vargo, S., Maglio, P.& Akaka, M. (2008). On Value and Value Co-Creation: A Service Systems and Service Logic Perspective. European Management Journal, 26, 145-152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2008.04.003

Wei, W., Wang, J., Chen, X., Yang, J., & Min, X. (2018). Psychological contract model for knowledge collaboration in virtual community of practice: an analysis based on the game theory. Appl. Math. Comput 329, 175–187. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2018.01.053

Yin, R. K. (2014). Case Study Research: Design & Methods, 5th Ed, Sage. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.id/books?id=AjV1AwAAQBAJ

Zagenczyk, T. J., Gibney, R., Few, W. T., & Scott, K. L. (2011). Psychological contacts and organizational identification: the mediating effect of perceived organizational support. J. Labor. Res. 32, 254–281.doi: 10.1007/s12122-011-9111-z




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14203/STIPM.2022.353

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 STI Policy and Management Journal

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright of Journal of STI (Science Technology Innovation) Policy and Management Journal (e-ISSN 2502-5996 p-ISSN 2540-9786). Powered by OJS.